An article both accurate and mouth-watering

I consider it my duty to give credit where it’s due, and to point out accurate analyses of intellectual property rights by non-IP geeks.  Corby Kummer does an excellent job in this article about bread wars; or, what happens when collaborators in a recipe split up.  Kummer makes clear that neither a recipe nor a method of making bread is subject to protection, and that apart from a catchy and non-descriptive name, trademark protection isn’t available either.  Indeed, Kummer quotes baker Jim Lahey as saying “rather than squabble, bakers should do their best to help each other increase sales and steal back sales from the industrial producers that caught on to the idea that “artisanal” bread sells.”  Hmm . . . should the fashion industry take a slice from the bakers’ loaf instead of clamoring for protection of clothing designs?

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 9/28/2008 7:05 PM Phyllis wrote:
    I couldn't make it through the whole article, but it did bring to mind the New York bread store chain "Hot and Crusty." Does it remind one of delicious bread with a crunchy crust or stale bread with a crust that developed long after baking? You be the judge.
    Reply to this
  • 9/29/2008 7:24 AM Jessica Stone Levy wrote:
    Oh yeah!  I always did find "Hot & Crusty" to be an unappealing name.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.